Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-4960X
Aggregated performance score
Core i7-4960X outperforms Core i5-9400F by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 946 | 987 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 30 |
| Value for money | 1.78 | 20.72 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 (Desktop) | Intel Core i5 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 3 September 2013 (10 years old) | 7 January 2019 (5 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $182 |
| Current price | $337 (0.3x MSRP) | $122 (0.7x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
i5-9400F has 1064% better value for money than i7-4960X.
Technical specs
Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 385 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB (shared) | 9 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,860 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-4960X outperforms Core i5-9400F by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-4960X outperforms Core i5-9400F by 7% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-4960X by 103% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-4960X by 42% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-4960X by 48% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i7-4960X outperforms Core i5-9400F by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-4960X by 20% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 6.53 | 6.13 |
| Recency | 3 September 2013 | 7 January 2019 |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Cost | $999 | $182 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4960X and Core i5-9400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
