Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs Core i7-4860EQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-4860EQ outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8300 by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1766 | 2588 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.81 | 0.48 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 29 August 2013 (12 years ago) | November 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4860EQ and Core 2 Quad Q8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 1333 MHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 264 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 456 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4860EQ and Core 2 Quad Q8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1364 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Core 2 Quad Q8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-4860EQ and Core 2 Quad Q8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Core 2 Quad Q8300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Core 2 Quad Q8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 5200 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.13 | 1.09 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 95 Watt |
i7-4860EQ has a 187.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 102.1% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-4860EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i7-4860EQ is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8300 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
