Turion 64 X2 TL-52 vs i7-4810MQ
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1461 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i7 | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
Power efficiency | 7.69 | no data |
Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Trinidad (2006−2007) |
Release date | 20 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 17 May 2006 (18 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCPGA946 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
FDI | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | no data |
Max video memory | 2 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.3 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
VGA | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52.
PCIe version | 3 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 January 2014 | 17 May 2006 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 31 Watt |
i7-4810MQ has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 X2 TL-52, on the other hand, has 51.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4810MQ and Turion 64 X2 TL-52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.