Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Core i7-4800MQ

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-4800MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads
3.70
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads
49.14
+1228%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by a whopping 1228% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking138832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.97
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)8 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data
Current price$253 (0.7x MSRP)$2799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size177 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600-
Max video memory2 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12-
OpenGL4.3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4800MQ 3.70
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 49.14
+1228%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by 1228% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4800MQ 5730
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 76009
+1227%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by 1227% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4800MQ 1031
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 2018
+95.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by 96% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4800MQ 3058
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 16539
+441%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by 441% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.70 49.14
Recency 29 April 2013 8 March 2022
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4800MQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4800MQ is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4800MQ and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Core i7-4800MQ
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 160 votes

Rate Core i7-4800MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4800MQ or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.