Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-4800MQ

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-4800MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads
3.72
+4.8%
Core i7-2600K
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
3.55

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13801427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data1.32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)9 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$317
Current price$253 (0.7x MSRP)$120 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm2216 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDI++
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics 3000
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.35 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4800MQ 3.72
+4.8%
i7-2600K 3.55

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4800MQ 5748
+4.8%
i7-2600K 5483

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 5% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4800MQ 1030
+54.7%
i7-2600K 666

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 55% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4800MQ 3057
+32.4%
i7-2600K 2309

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 32% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-4800MQ 5233
+8.8%
i7-2600K 4809

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4800MQ 20089
+8%
i7-2600K 18608

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4800MQ 7265
+8.9%
i7-2600K 6669

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 9% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-4800MQ 7.72
+36%
i7-2600K 10.5

Core i7-2600K outperforms Core i7-4800MQ by 36% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-4800MQ 7
+6.7%
i7-2600K 7

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 7% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4800MQ 663
+8.1%
i7-2600K 614

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 8% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4800MQ 142
+10.1%
i7-2600K 129

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 10% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-4800MQ 1.63
+7.9%
i7-2600K 1.51

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 4.1
+22.7%
i7-2600K 3.3

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 23% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 4473
+28.3%
i7-2600K 3486

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 28% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 160
+10.4%
i7-2600K 145

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 10% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4800MQ 42
+13.7%
i7-2600K 37

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 14% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-4800MQ 3355
+11.3%
i7-2600K 3015

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 11% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-4800MQ 12753
+10.4%
i7-2600K 11547

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 10% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-4800MQ 6770
+34.9%
i7-2600K 5020

Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i7-2600K by 35% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 3.72 3.55
Integrated graphics card 1.83 0.66
Recency 29 April 2013 9 January 2011
Cost $378 $317
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 95 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K.

Be aware that Core i7-4800MQ is a notebook processor while Core i7-2600K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-2600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Core i7-4800MQ
Intel Core i7-2600K
Core i7-2600K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 159 votes

Rate Core i7-4800MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1333 votes

Rate Core i7-2600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4800MQ or Core i7-2600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.