Core Ultra 9 185H vs Core i7-4712MQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4712MQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 37 Watt
3.42
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.34
+436%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1464293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Meteor Lake-H
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Meteor Lake-H
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data
Current price$472 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads822
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600Intel® Arc™ graphics
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz2.35 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@30Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212.2
OpenGL4.34.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes1628
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4712MQ 3.42
Ultra 9 185H 18.34
+436%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 436% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4712MQ 5341
Ultra 9 185H 28618
+436%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 436% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4712MQ 947
Ultra 9 185H 2253
+138%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 138% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4712MQ 2749
Ultra 9 185H 12119
+341%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 341% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-4712MQ 4817
Ultra 9 185H 10300
+114%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 114% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4712MQ 17929
Ultra 9 185H 59935
+234%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 234% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-4712MQ 8.39
Ultra 9 185H 5.68
+47.7%

Core i7-4712MQ outperforms Core Ultra 9 185H by 48% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-4712MQ 6
Ultra 9 185H 34
+426%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 426% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4712MQ 597
Ultra 9 185H 2746
+360%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 360% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4712MQ 130
Ultra 9 185H 268
+106%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 106% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-4712MQ 1.47
Ultra 9 185H 3.27
+122%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 122% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4712MQ 36
Ultra 9 185H 158
+339%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 339% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4712MQ 142
Ultra 9 185H 336
+136%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Core i7-4712MQ by 136% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.42 18.34
Recency 27 May 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 22
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 45 Watt

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4712MQ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4712MQ and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4712MQ
Core i7-4712MQ
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 115 votes

Rate Core i7-4712MQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 147 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4712MQ or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.