Xeon E3-1226 v3 vs i7-4710MQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-4710MQ outperforms Xeon E3-1226 v3 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1499 | 1546 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.30 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Xeon (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 7.39 | 3.92 |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 27 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 11 May 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | $213 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 160 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCPGA946 | FCLGA1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 84 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| FDI | + | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD P4600 |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | 1.7 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video HD | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 20 |
| InTru 3D | + | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| eDP | + | + |
| DisplayPort | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| VGA | + | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160@30Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | 2880x1800@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3.
| PCIe version | 3 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Geekbench 2
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.67 | 3.48 |
| Recency | 27 May 2013 | 11 May 2014 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 84 Watt |
i7-4710MQ has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 78.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon E3-1226 v3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3.
Be aware that Core i7-4710MQ is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1226 v3 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4710MQ and Xeon E3-1226 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
