Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-4700HQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4700HQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.65
Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.53
+134%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1417828
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.50
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+)
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$199
Current price$877 (2.3x MSRP)$147 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)576 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size264 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1364AM4
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600-
Max video memory2 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@30Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12-
OpenGL4.3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4700HQ 3.65
Ryzen 5 2600 8.53
+134%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 134% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4700HQ 5653
Ryzen 5 2600 13199
+133%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 133% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4700HQ 983
Ryzen 5 2600 1153
+17.3%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4700HQ 3063
Ryzen 5 2600 4849
+58.3%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 58% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-4700HQ 4895
+3.6%
Ryzen 5 2600 4726

Core i7-4700HQ outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4700HQ 18609
Ryzen 5 2600 28173
+51.4%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 51% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-4700HQ 6759
Ryzen 5 2600 9290
+37.5%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 37% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-4700HQ 8.09
Ryzen 5 2600 5.5
+47.1%

Core i7-4700HQ outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 47% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-4700HQ 7
Ryzen 5 2600 14
+97.8%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 98% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4700HQ 637
Ryzen 5 2600 1248
+95.9%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 96% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-4700HQ 132
Ryzen 5 2600 157
+19.2%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-4700HQ 1.5
Ryzen 5 2600 1.76
+17.3%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 17% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4700HQ 3.8
Ryzen 5 2600 7.5
+100%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 100% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4700HQ 4325
Ryzen 5 2600 4517
+4.4%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 4% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4700HQ 34
Ryzen 5 2600 75
+121%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 121% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-4700HQ 141
Ryzen 5 2600 205
+45.6%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ by 46% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 8.53
Recency 27 May 2013 13 April 2018
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Cost $378 $199
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4700HQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4700HQ is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4700HQ and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4700HQ
Core i7-4700HQ
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 223 votes

Rate Core i7-4700HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14154 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4700HQ or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.