Xeon E5649 vs i7-4700EQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4700EQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.10
Xeon E5649
2011, $45
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
3.23
+4.2%

Xeon E5649 outperforms Core i7-4700EQ by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18521810
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.56
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency2.781.70
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)14 February 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.93 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA1364FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data288 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-4700EQ 3.10
Xeon E5649 3.23
+4.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-4700EQ 5417
Samples: 32
Xeon E5649 5646
+4.2%
Samples: 45

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-4700EQ 693
+67%
Xeon E5649 415

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-4700EQ 2463
+16.8%
Xeon E5649 2109

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.10 3.23
Recency 27 May 2013 14 February 2011
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 80 Watt

i7-4700EQ has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5649, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i7-4700EQ and Intel Xeon E5649.

Be aware that Core i7-4700EQ is a notebook processor while Xeon E5649 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-4700EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 48 votes

Rate Xeon E5649 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-4700EQ and Xeon E5649, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.