Turion X2 RM-70 vs i7-4700EQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-4700EQ outperforms Turion X2 RM-70 by a whopping 675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1565 | 2956 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | 2x AMD Turion |
Power efficiency | 6.87 | 1.34 |
Architecture codename | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Puma (2008−2009) |
Release date | 27 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | Intel BGA1364 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4600 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.41 | 0.44 |
Recency | 27 May 2013 | 3 June 2008 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 31 Watt |
i7-4700EQ has a 675% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.
Turion X2 RM-70, on the other hand, has 51.6% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-4700EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-70 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4700EQ and Turion X2 RM-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.