Celeron G1101 vs i7-3970X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3970X
2012, $593
6 cores / 12 threads, 150 Watt
4.85
+682%

Core i7-3970X outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14043021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.610.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.470.91
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 November 2012 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$593$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1101 has 59% better value for money than i7-3970X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm281 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size64.45 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes401

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-3970X 4.85
+682%
Celeron G1101 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-3970X 8554
+688%
Samples: 359
Celeron G1101 1086
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.85 0.62
Recency 1 November 2012 7 January 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 73 Watt

i7-3970X has a 682.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron G1101, on the other hand, has 105.5% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G1101 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3970X
Core i7-3970X
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 39 votes

Rate Core i7-3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-3970X and Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.