A4-1200 vs Core i7-3970X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3970X and A4-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1086not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Temash (2013)
Release date1 November 2012 (11 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$593no data
Current price$282 (0.5x MSRP)$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3970X and A4-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3970X and A4-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FT3
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3970X and A4-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1066
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3970X and A4-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3970X and A4-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3970X and A4-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size64.45 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8180

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3970X and A4-1200.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3970X 8541
+2215%
A4-1200 369

Core i7-3970X outperforms A4-1200 by 2215% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3970X 653
+494%
A4-1200 110

Core i7-3970X outperforms A4-1200 by 494% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3970X 3327
+1651%
A4-1200 190

Core i7-3970X outperforms A4-1200 by 1651% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2012 23 May 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-3970X and A4-1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-3970X is a desktop processor while A4-1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3970X and A4-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3970X
Core i7-3970X
AMD A4-1200
A4-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 23 votes

Rate Core i7-3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 35 votes

Rate A4-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3970X or A4-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.