Ryzen 5 7500F vs Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1041 | 338 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 28 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.66 | 45.64 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Raphael |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 (11 years ago) | 22 July 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | $690 | $304 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 7500F has 6815% better value for money than i7-3970X Extreme Edition.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus support | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1,536 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F.
| PCIe version | 2.00 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.97 | 17.40 |
| Recency | 12 November 2012 | 22 July 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Ryzen 5 7500F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Ryzen 5 7500F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
