i7-4860HQ vs i7-3970X Extreme Edition
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1115 | 1433 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | 3.66 | 7.90 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Crystalwell (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 19 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $434 |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 35 | 24 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1,536 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 264 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1364 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 47 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| My WiFi | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| FDI | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
| Max video memory | no data | 2 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| VGA | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ.
| PCIe version | 2.00 | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.83 | 3.94 |
| Recency | 12 November 2012 | 19 January 2014 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 47 Watt |
i7-3970X Extreme Edition has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
i7-4860HQ, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 219.1% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4860HQ in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition is a desktop processor while Core i7-4860HQ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition and Core i7-4860HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
