Core i7-7740X vs Core i7-3960X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3960X
2011
6 cores / 12 threads
5.43
Core i7-7740X
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
6.22
+14.5%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1064980
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.405.15
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Core i7 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Kaby Lake-X (2017)
Release date14 November 2011 (12 years ago)26 June 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$861$339
Current price$170 (0.2x MSRP)$276 (0.8x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-7740X has 115% better value for money than i7-3960X.

Technical specs

Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °C72 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt112 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s42 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataHD 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3960X 5.43
i7-7740X 6.22
+14.5%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3960X 8401
i7-7740X 9611
+14.4%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 14% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3960X 688
i7-7740X 1628
+137%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 137% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3960X 3350
i7-7740X 5258
+57%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 57% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-3960X 5014
i7-7740X 7397
+47.5%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 48% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3960X 27190
i7-7740X 29538
+8.6%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3960X 8330
i7-7740X 10252
+23.1%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 23% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-3960X 5.12
+6.3%
i7-7740X 5.44

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 6% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-3960X 11
i7-7740X 11
+3.2%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-3960X 1158
+16.9%
i7-7740X 991

Core i7-3960X outperforms Core i7-7740X by 17% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-3960X 159
i7-7740X 196
+23%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-3960X 1.52
i7-7740X 2.21
+45.4%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 45% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3960X 5.2
i7-7740X 5.6
+7.7%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 8% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3960X 4205
i7-7740X 6417
+52.6%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 53% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3960X 173
i7-7740X 234
+35%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 35% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3960X 55
i7-7740X 62
+12.6%

Core i7-7740X outperforms Core i7-3960X by 13% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.43 6.22
Recency 14 November 2011 26 June 2017
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Cost $861 $339
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 112 Watt

The Core i7-7740X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3960X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3960X and Core i7-7740X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3960X
Core i7-3960X
Intel Core i7-7740X
Core i7-7740X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 58 votes

Rate Core i7-3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 59 votes

Rate Core i7-7740X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3960X or Core i7-7740X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.