EPYC 7773X vs i7-3960X Extreme Edition
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7773X outperforms Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition by a whopping 930% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1369 | 44 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.64 | 7.86 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1,536 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 434.72 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2270 Million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and EPYC 7773X.
| PCIe version | 2.00 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.02 | 51.69 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 22 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 64 |
| Threads | 12 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 280 Watt |
i7-3960X Extreme Edition has 115.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 929.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition is a desktop processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
