Core 2 Extreme QX9300 vs Core i7-3940XM

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3940XM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
3.77
+222%

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by a whopping 222% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13752249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Core 2 Extreme
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 September 2012 (11 years ago)August 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,096no data
Current price$525 (0.5x MSRP)$844

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.53 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)12 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCPGA988PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
AMTno data+
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3940XM 3.77
+222%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.17

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 222% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3940XM 5830
+223%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 223% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-3940XM 5252
+68.7%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3114

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 69% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3940XM 20564
+89%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 10882

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 89% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3940XM 7176
+89.8%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3780

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 90% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-3940XM 6.98
+126%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 15.74

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core i7-3940XM by 126% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-3940XM 7
+184%
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3

Core i7-3940XM outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 184% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.77 1.17
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

The Core i7-3940XM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX9300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3940XM and Core 2 Extreme QX9300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3940XM
Core i7-3940XM
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 137 votes

Rate Core i7-3940XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 90 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3940XM or Core 2 Extreme QX9300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.