Xeon E5-4640 v4 vs i7-3930K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3930K
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.16
Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
14.20
+175%

Xeon E5-4640 v4 outperforms Core i7-3930K by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1193507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.492.97
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency3.7612.80
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$611$2,837

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-4640 v4 has 506% better value for money than i7-3930K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate5 GT/s2 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size64.23 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3930K 5.16
Xeon E5-4640 v4 14.20
+175%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3930K 8204
Xeon E5-4640 v4 22559
+175%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 14.20
Recency 14 November 2011 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E5-4640 v4 has a 175.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 23.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3930K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3930K is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4640 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3930K and Xeon E5-4640 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3930K
Core i7-3930K
Intel Xeon E5-4640 v4
Xeon E5-4640 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 278 votes

Rate Core i7-3930K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3930K or Xeon E5-4640 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.