Core i5-8400B vs Core i7-3930K
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1154 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.52 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
Release date | 14 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 2 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $611 | $182 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 6 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 9 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 435 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,270 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 2011 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 November 2011 | 2 April 2018 |
Threads | 12 | 6 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
i7-3930K has 100% more threads.
i5-8400B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-3930K is a desktop processor while Core i5-8400B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3930K and Core i5-8400B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.