Atom C3758 vs i7-3910K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1942
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.59
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data4.62
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date24 July 2013 (12 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)448 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket2011FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-

Security technologies

Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 July 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 25 Watt

i7-3910K has 50% more threads.

Atom C3758, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 33% more physical cores, a 129% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core i7-3910K and Intel Atom C3758. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-3910K is a desktop processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Core i7-3910K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-3910K and Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.