Xeon Platinum 8592+ vs i7-3820
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8592+ outperforms Core i7-3820 by a whopping 1352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1732 | 54 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.41 | 1.13 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | 5.78 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | February 2012 (13 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $11,600 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 176% better value for money than i7-3820.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 10240 KB (shared) | 320 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 294 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1270 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64.23 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3820 and Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 80 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.28 | 47.64 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 64 |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 350 Watt |
i7-3820 has 169.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8592+, on the other hand, has a 1352.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-3820 in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-3820 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8592+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
