Celeron N6211 vs i7-3820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3820
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.70
+157%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.44

Core i7-3820 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14882197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.323.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency2.6420.58
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release dateFebruary 2012 (12 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$400$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 44% better value for money than i7-3820.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size64.23 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3820 3.70
+157%
Celeron N6211 1.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3820 5769
+157%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.70 1.44
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 6 Watt

i7-3820 has a 156.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 2066.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3820 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3820
Core i7-3820
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 326 votes

Rate Core i7-3820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3820 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.