A10-5800K vs Core i7-3770S

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3770S
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
4.03
+109%

Core i7-3770S outperforms A10-5800K by 109% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13221845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.753.20
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date29 April 2012 (11 years old)2 October 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$330$122
Current price$283 (0.9x MSRP)$76 (0.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-5800K has 327% better value for money than i7-3770S.

Technical specs

Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770S 4.03
+109%
A10-5800K 1.93

Core i7-3770S outperforms A10-5800K by 109% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3770S 6180
+109%
A10-5800K 2958

Core i7-3770S outperforms A10-5800K by 109% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770S 668
+48.8%
A10-5800K 449

Core i7-3770S outperforms A10-5800K by 49% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770S 2234
+104%
A10-5800K 1097

Core i7-3770S outperforms A10-5800K by 104% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-3770S 7470
+92%
A10-5800K 3890

Core i7-3770S outperforms A10-5800K by 92% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.03 1.93
Integrated graphics card 1.17 1.30
Recency 29 April 2012 2 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Cost $330 $122
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

The Core i7-3770S is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5800K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770S and A10-5800K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770S
Core i7-3770S
AMD A10-5800K
A10-5800K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 249 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-3770S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 444 votes

Rate AMD A10-5800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770S or A10-5800K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.