FX-6300 vs Core i7-3770K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
4.22
+56.3%

Core i7-3770K outperforms FX-6300 by 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-3770K and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12791588
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Value for money1.581.32
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date29 April 2012 (11 years old)23 October 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data
Current price$148 (0.5x MSRP)$49
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-3770K has 20% better value for money than FX-6300.

Technical specs

Core i7-3770K and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and FX-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and FX-6300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and FX-6300.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.22
+56.3%
FX-6300 2.70

Core i7-3770K outperforms FX-6300 by 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3770K 6463
+56.2%
FX-6300 4137

Core i7-3770K outperforms FX-6300 by 56% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770K 708
+53.2%
FX-6300 462

Core i7-3770K outperforms FX-6300 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770K 2476
+70.5%
FX-6300 1452

Core i7-3770K outperforms FX-6300 by 71% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-3770K 8680
+77.1%
FX-6300 4900

Core i7-3770K outperforms FX-6300 by 77% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.22 2.70
Recency 29 April 2012 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 95 Watt

The Core i7-3770K is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2348 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3665 votes

Rate AMD FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.