Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-3630QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3630QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.31
+128%

i7-3630QM outperforms i3-3225 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15522151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date30 September 2012 (11 years ago)3 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284$264

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1400 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA9881155
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology++

Security technologies

Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD 4000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3630QM 3.31
+128%
i3-3225 1.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3630QM 5120
+129%
i3-3225 2236

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3630QM 559
+4.5%
i3-3225 535

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3630QM 1899
+67.5%
i3-3225 1134

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.31 1.45
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

i7-3630QM has a 128.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3630QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3225 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-3630QM is a notebook processor while Core i3-3225 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3630QM and Core i3-3225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3630QM
Core i7-3630QM
Intel Core i3-3225
Core i3-3225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 921 vote

Rate Core i7-3630QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 224 votes

Rate Core i3-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3630QM or Core i3-3225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.