Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i7-3615QM

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3615QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
3.37

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by a whopping 201% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1474690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$299
Current price$738 (2x MSRP)$176 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size160 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1224AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3615QM 3.37
Ryzen 7 2700 10.16
+201%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 201% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3615QM 5206
Ryzen 7 2700 15717
+202%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 202% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3615QM 547
Ryzen 7 2700 1113
+103%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 103% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3615QM 1863
Ryzen 7 2700 5489
+195%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 195% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-3615QM 4436
Ryzen 7 2700 4505
+1.6%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 2% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3615QM 16981
Ryzen 7 2700 31385
+84.8%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 85% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3615QM 5574
Ryzen 7 2700 9475
+70%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 70% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-3615QM 8.45
Ryzen 7 2700 5.14
+64.4%

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 64% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-3615QM 6
Ryzen 7 2700 17
+202%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 202% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-3615QM 1.34
Ryzen 7 2700 1.78
+32.8%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 33% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 3
Ryzen 7 2700 9
+200%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 200% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 3626
Ryzen 7 2700 4440
+22.4%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 22% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 138
Ryzen 7 2700 196
+42.3%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 42% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 34
Ryzen 7 2700 90
+161%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 161% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.37 10.16
Recency 29 April 2012 19 April 2018
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $378 $299
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3615QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-3615QM is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3615QM and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3615QM
Core i7-3615QM
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 42 votes

Rate Core i7-3615QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2841 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3615QM or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.