Core i7-2860QM vs Core i7-3615QM

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-3615QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads
3.36
+13.9%
Core i7-2860QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
2.95

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14691545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$568
Current price$738 (2x MSRP)$823 (1.4x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2216 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1224FCBGA1224,FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching--
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theft++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.3 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3615QM 3.36
+13.9%
i7-2860QM 2.95

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3615QM 5202
+14.2%
i7-2860QM 4556

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 14% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3615QM 548
i7-2860QM 563
+2.7%

Core i7-2860QM outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3615QM 1867
+10.6%
i7-2860QM 1688

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 11% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-3615QM 4436
i7-2860QM 4576
+3.2%

Core i7-2860QM outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3615QM 16981
+1%
i7-2860QM 16810

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3615QM 5574
i7-2860QM 6323
+13.4%

Core i7-2860QM outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 13% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-3615QM 8.45
i7-2860QM 7.8
+8.3%

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 8% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-3615QM 6
i7-2860QM 6
+6.3%

Core i7-2860QM outperforms Core i7-3615QM by 6% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 3
+11.1%
i7-2860QM 2.7

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 11% in TrueCrypt AES.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 138
+4.4%
i7-2860QM 132

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 4% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3615QM 34
+7.6%
i7-2860QM 32

Core i7-3615QM outperforms Core i7-2860QM by 8% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 3.36 2.95
Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.66
Recency 29 April 2012 4 September 2011
Cost $378 $568
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

The Core i7-3615QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2860QM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3615QM and Core i7-2860QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3615QM
Core i7-3615QM
Intel Core i7-2860QM
Core i7-2860QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Core i7-3615QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 177 votes

Rate Core i7-2860QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3615QM or Core i7-2860QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.