Turion 64 X2 TL-52 vs i7-3555LE

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2204not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency5.34no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Trinidad (2006−2007)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)17 May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA1023no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2012 17 May 2006
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 31 Watt

i7-3555LE has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3555LE and Turion 64 X2 TL-52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3555LE
Core i7-3555LE
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Turion 64 X2 TL-52

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-3555LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3555LE or Turion 64 X2 TL-52, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.