FX-9800P vs i7-3555LE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3555LE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.41
FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.61
+14.2%

FX-9800P outperforms Core i7-3555LE by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22192102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency5.3410.16
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)320 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size118 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1023FP4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3555LE 1.41
FX-9800P 1.61
+14.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3555LE 2238
FX-9800P 2562
+14.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 1.61
Recency 3 June 2012 31 May 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

i7-3555LE has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9800P, on the other hand, has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The FX-9800P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3555LE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3555LE and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3555LE
Core i7-3555LE
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-3555LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3555LE or FX-9800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.