Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs i7-3520M

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3520M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.80
+23.3%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.46

Core i7-3520M outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20172178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i74x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency4.873.07
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXHyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3520M 1.80
+23.3%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 1.46

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-3520M 4855
+151%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 1935

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-3520M 10467
+47.8%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 7082

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-3520M 4134
+30.7%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 3164

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-3520M 15.43
+13.4%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 17.5

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-3520M 3
+28.7%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 1.46
Recency 3 June 2012 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

i7-3520M has a 23.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 X920 BE, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Core i7-3520M is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 X920 BE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3520M and Phenom II X4 X920 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3520M
Core i7-3520M
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Phenom II X4 X920 BE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 320 votes

Rate Core i7-3520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 X920 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3520M or Phenom II X4 X920 BE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.