FX-4300 vs i7-2920XM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2920XM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
2.70
+43.6%
FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.88

Core i7-2920XM outperforms FX-4300 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16991973
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.26
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency4.651.87
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,096$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300.

PCIe version2.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2920XM 2.70
+43.6%
FX-4300 1.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2920XM 4286
+43.7%
FX-4300 2983

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2920XM 417
FX-4300 454
+8.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2920XM 1395
+26.4%
FX-4300 1104

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 1.88
Recency 3 January 2011 23 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 95 Watt

i7-2920XM has a 43.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 72.7% lower power consumption.

FX-4300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Core i7-2920XM is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2920XM is a notebook processor while FX-4300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2920XM and FX-4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2920XM
Core i7-2920XM
AMD FX-4300
FX-4300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 20 votes

Rate Core i7-2920XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1728 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2920XM or FX-4300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.