Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i7-2840QM

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-2840QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
2.48
+0.4%
Ryzen 3 3200U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads
2.47

General info

Comparing Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16351639
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Picasso-U (Zen)
Release date4 September 2011 (12 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current priceno data$488

Technical specs

Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size216 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1160 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket G2FP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2840QM 2.48
+0.4%
Ryzen 3 3200U 2.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2840QM 3842
+0.6%
Ryzen 3 3200U 3819

Core i7-2840QM outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.48 2.47
Integrated graphics card 0.66 2.97
Recency 4 September 2011 6 January 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2840QM and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1375 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2840QM or Ryzen 3 3200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.