Pentium B940 vs i7-2840QM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2840QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.43
+350%
Pentium B940
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54

Core i7-2840QM outperforms Pentium B940 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17632833
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Pentium
Power efficiency5.091.45
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)13 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier2420
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors1160 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket G2PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2840QM 2.43
+350%
Pentium B940 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2840QM 3842
+346%
Pentium B940 861

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 0.54
Recency 4 September 2011 13 June 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i7-2840QM has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Pentium B940, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2840QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium B940 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2840QM and Pentium B940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM
Intel Pentium B940
Pentium B940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 140 votes

Rate Pentium B940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2840QM or Pentium B940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.