Celeron N5095A vs Core i7-2820QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2820QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.84
+6.8%

i7-2820QM outperforms Celeron N5095A by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16071639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors995 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1224, FCPGA988no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A.

PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2820QM 2.84
+6.8%
Celeron N5095A 2.66

Core i7-2820QM outperforms Celeron N5095A by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2820QM 4385
+6.5%
Celeron N5095A 4118

Core i7-2820QM outperforms Celeron N5095A by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 2.66
Recency 3 January 2011 1 July 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

i7-2820QM has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A.

Be aware that Core i7-2820QM is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2820QM and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2820QM
Core i7-2820QM
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 150 votes

Rate Core i7-2820QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 81 vote

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2820QM or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.