i9-12900TE vs i7-2715QE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2715QE
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.83
Core i9-12900TE
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 35 Watt
13.03
+612%

Core i9-12900TE outperforms Core i7-2715QE by a whopping 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2133616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency1.7215.72
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date3 January 2011 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size216 mm2215 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1160 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA10231700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-2715QE 1.83
i9-12900TE 13.03
+612%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-2715QE Samples: 4 3221
i9-12900TE Samples: 2 22887
+611%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 13.03
Integrated graphics card 0.57 5.37
Recency 3 January 2011 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

i9-12900TE has a 612% higher aggregate performance score, 842.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-12900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-2715QE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2715QE is a notebook processor while Core i9-12900TE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2715QE
Core i7-2715QE
Intel Core i9-12900TE
Core i9-12900TE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2715QE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Core i9-12900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-2715QE and Core i9-12900TE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.