Apple M4 (8 cores) vs i7-2700K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2700K
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.57
Apple M4 (8 cores)
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 5 Watt
12.93
+262%

Apple M4 (8 cores) outperforms Core i7-2700K by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1657671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Apple M4
Power efficiency1.45100.00
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date24 October 2011 (13 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$514no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Apple M4 8-core GPU
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores) integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores).

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-2700K 3.57
Apple M4 (8 cores) 12.93
+262%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-2700K 5735
Apple M4 (8 cores) 20795
+263%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.57 12.93
Recency 24 October 2011 28 October 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 5 Watt

Apple M4 (8 cores) has a 262.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1800% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 (8 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-2700K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-2700K is a desktop processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2700K
Core i7-2700K
Apple M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 807 votes

Rate Core i7-2700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 39 votes

Rate M4 (8 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-2700K and M4 (8 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.