E2-1800 vs i7-2677M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2677M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.20
+329%
E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28

Core i7-2677M outperforms E2-1800 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2677M and E2-1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23463133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD E-Series
Power efficiency6.681.47
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date27 June 2011 (13 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2677M and E2-1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size149 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2677M and E2-1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2677M and E2-1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2677M and E2-1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2677M and E2-1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2677M and E2-1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon HD 7340
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2677M and E2-1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2677M and E2-1800.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2677M 1.20
+329%
E2-1800 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2677M 1912
+326%
E2-1800 449

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2677M 338
+213%
E2-1800 108

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2677M 673
+272%
E2-1800 181

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-2677M 3614
+226%
E2-1800 1110

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-2677M 6672
+215%
E2-1800 2121

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-2677M 2729
+152%
E2-1800 1083

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-2677M 19.6
+252%
E2-1800 69.05

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-2677M 2
+233%
E2-1800 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 0.28
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.40
Recency 27 June 2011 6 June 2012
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 18 Watt

i7-2677M has a 328.6% higher aggregate performance score, 65% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

E2-1800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

The Core i7-2677M is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2677M is a notebook processor while E2-1800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2677M and E2-1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2677M
Core i7-2677M
AMD E2-1800
E2-1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Core i7-2677M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2677M or E2-1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.