AMD Ryzen 3 3200U vs Intel Core i7-2675QM

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

i7-2675QM
2.55
+2.4%

Core i7-2675QM outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 2% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16111628
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Picasso-U (Zen)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years old)6 January 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data
Current price$696 (1.8x MSRP)$488

Technical specs

Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size216 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1224FP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2675QM 2.55
+2.4%
Ryzen 3 3200U 2.49

Core i7-2675QM outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 2% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2675QM 3919
+2.5%
Ryzen 3 3200U 3822

Core i7-2675QM outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2675QM 434
Ryzen 3 3200U 775
+78.6%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Core i7-2675QM by 79% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2675QM 1366
Ryzen 3 3200U 1488
+8.9%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Core i7-2675QM by 9% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

i7-2675QM 10090
+39.4%
Ryzen 3 3200U 7237

Core i7-2675QM outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 39% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

i7-2675QM 3100
Ryzen 3 3200U 3626
+17%

Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Core i7-2675QM by 17% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.55 2.49
Integrated graphics card 0.66 2.96
Recency 12 October 2011 6 January 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2675QM and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-2675QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1366 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2675QM or Ryzen 3 3200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.