Ryzen 7 9700X vs i7-2657M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2657M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.99
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.35
+2259%

Ryzen 7 9700X outperforms Core i7-2657M by a whopping 2259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2480222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency5.5133.98
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size149 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors624 Million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023AM5
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2657M 0.99
Ryzen 7 9700X 23.35
+2259%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-2657M 3491
Ryzen 7 9700X 9457
+171%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-2657M 6229
Ryzen 7 9700X 57914
+830%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-2657M 2546
Ryzen 7 9700X 18794
+638%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-2657M 2
Ryzen 7 9700X 36
+1797%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 23.35
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.98
Recency 3 January 2011 8 August 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

i7-2657M has 282.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 9700X, on the other hand, has a 2258.6% higher aggregate performance score, 200% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 9700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2657M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2657M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 9700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2657M and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2657M
Core i7-2657M
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 307 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2657M or Ryzen 7 9700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.