Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i7-2640M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2640M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.59
Ryzen 7 3800X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
14.98
+842%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms i7-2640M by a whopping 842% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2009438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.13
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date4 September 2011 (12 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$399
Current price$114 (0.3x MSRP)$282 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2640M 1.59
Ryzen 7 3800X 14.98
+842%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i7-2640M by 842% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2640M 2467
Ryzen 7 3800X 23164
+839%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i7-2640M by 839% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2640M 513
Ryzen 7 3800X 1697
+231%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i7-2640M by 231% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2640M 997
Ryzen 7 3800X 8447
+747%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i7-2640M by 747% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 14.98
Recency 4 September 2011 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Cost $346 $399
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3800X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2640M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2640M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 3800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2640M and Ryzen 7 3800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2640M
Core i7-2640M
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 323 votes

Rate Core i7-2640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 1675 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2640M or Ryzen 7 3800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.