Processor N100 vs Core i7-2640M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-2640M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads
1.59
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads
3.29
+107%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by a whopping 107% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2640M and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19881491
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Alder Lake-N
Release date4 September 2011 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$128
Current price$114 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2640M and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2.8 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2640M and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2640M and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2640M and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2640M and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2640M and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2640M and Processor N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2640M and Processor N100.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2640M 1.59
Processor N100 3.29
+107%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 107% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2640M 4443
Processor N100 4869
+9.6%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2640M 9778
Processor N100 15207
+55.5%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 56% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2640M 3927
Processor N100 6435
+63.9%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 64% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-2640M 15.14
+5.1%
Processor N100 15.91

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 5% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2640M 3
Processor N100 5
+64.4%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 64% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-2640M 1.36
Processor N100 1.83
+34.6%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 35% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2640M 1.6
Processor N100 2.9
+81.3%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 81% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2640M 2620
+10.5%
Processor N100 2372

Core i7-2640M outperforms Processor N100 by 10% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2640M 89
Processor N100 173
+93.2%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 93% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2640M 17
Processor N100 34
+99.1%

Processor N100 outperforms Core i7-2640M by 99% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 3.29
Integrated graphics card 0.66 2.33
Recency 4 September 2011 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Cost $346 $128
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2640M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2640M and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2640M
Core i7-2640M
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 318 votes

Rate Core i7-2640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 751 vote

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2640M or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.