Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i7-2630QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2630QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.29
Ryzen 7 5700G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.89
+594%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by a whopping 594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1725401
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.93
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cezanne (Zen 3)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$359
Current price$124 (0.3x MSRP)$1050 (2.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size216 mm2AM4 (1331) mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PPGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2630QM 2.29
Ryzen 7 5700G 15.89
+594%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2630QM 3543
Ryzen 7 5700G 24573
+594%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 594% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2630QM 436
Ryzen 7 5700G 1983
+355%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 355% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2630QM 1368
Ryzen 7 5700G 8739
+539%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 539% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2630QM 3662
Ryzen 7 5700G 6196
+69.2%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 69% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2630QM 13833
Ryzen 7 5700G 38827
+181%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 181% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2630QM 5039
Ryzen 7 5700G 14324
+184%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 184% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-2630QM 10.1
Ryzen 7 5700G 4.33
+133%

Core i7-2630QM outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 133% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2630QM 5
Ryzen 7 5700G 24
+389%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 389% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 15.89
Integrated graphics card 0.66 9.08
Recency 3 January 2011 13 April 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $378 $359
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 5700G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2630QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2630QM is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5700G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2630QM and Ryzen 7 5700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2630QM
Core i7-2630QM
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Ryzen 7 5700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 449 votes

Rate Core i7-2630QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3247 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2630QM or Ryzen 7 5700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.