Core i7-9700 vs Core i7-2630QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2630QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.29

i7-9700 outperforms i7-2630QM by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1727837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.42
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$323
Current price$124 (0.3x MSRP)$225 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PPGA988FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2630QM 2.29
i7-9700 8.53
+272%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2630QM 3546
i7-9700 13193
+272%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 272% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2630QM 437
i7-9700 1557
+256%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 256% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2630QM 1371
i7-9700 6199
+352%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 352% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2630QM 3662
i7-9700 7473
+104%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 104% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2630QM 13833
i7-9700 37381
+170%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 170% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-2630QM 10.1
i7-9700 4.79
+111%

Core i7-2630QM outperforms Core i7-9700 by 111% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2630QM 5
i7-9700 14
+200%

Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i7-2630QM by 200% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 8.53
Integrated graphics card 0.66 3.09
Recency 3 January 2011 23 April 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Cost $378 $323
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2630QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2630QM is a notebook processor while Core i7-9700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2630QM and Core i7-9700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2630QM
Core i7-2630QM
Intel Core i7-9700
Core i7-9700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 465 votes

Rate Core i7-2630QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 975 votes

Rate Core i7-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2630QM or Core i7-9700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.