Celeron G1820 vs i7-2620M

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2620M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.53
+41.7%
Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.08

Core i7-2620M outperforms Celeron G1820 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21272404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency4.141.89
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm2177 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors624 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memoryno data1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
VGAno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.1/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820.

PCIe version2.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2620M 1.53
+41.7%
Celeron G1820 1.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2620M 2423
+41%
Celeron G1820 1718

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-2620M 512
+4.9%
Celeron G1820 488

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-2620M 1017
+22.5%
Celeron G1820 830

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 1.08
Recency 20 February 2011 1 December 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 53 Watt

i7-2620M has a 41.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 51.4% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1820, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-2620M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2620M is a notebook processor while Celeron G1820 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2620M and Celeron G1820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2620M
Core i7-2620M
Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 177 votes

Rate Core i7-2620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 165 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2620M or Celeron G1820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.