A9-9400 SoC vs i7-2620M
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2127 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.14 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 20 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $346 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 27 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 149 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | 624 Million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1023,PPGA988 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Radeon R5 3CU |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.3 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 February 2011 | 31 May 2016 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
i7-2620M has 100% more threads.
A9-9400 SoC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-2620M is a notebook processor while A9-9400 SoC is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2620M and A9-9400 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.