A8-5600K vs Core i7-2600K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-2600K
2011
4 cores / 8 threads
3.55
+92.9%

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 93% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14271882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.323.69
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)2 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data
Current price$120 (0.4x MSRP)$52

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-5600K has 180% better value for money than i7-2600K.

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2600K 3.55
+92.9%
A8-5600K 1.84

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 93% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2600K 5483
+92.5%
A8-5600K 2849

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 92% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2600K 666
+51.4%
A8-5600K 440

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 51% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2600K 2311
+118%
A8-5600K 1058

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 118% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2600K 4809
+63.5%
A8-5600K 2941

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 64% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2600K 18608
+111%
A8-5600K 8838

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 111% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2600K 6669
+55.3%
A8-5600K 4295

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 55% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-2600K 10.5
+59%
A8-5600K 16.7

A8-5600K outperforms Core i7-2600K by 59% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2600K 7
+111%
A8-5600K 3

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 111% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-2600K 614
+110%
A8-5600K 292

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 110% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-2600K 129
+48.3%
A8-5600K 87

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 48% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-2600K 1.51
+54.1%
A8-5600K 0.98

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 54% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2600K 3.3
+83.3%
A8-5600K 1.8

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 83% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2600K 3486
+42.3%
A8-5600K 2449

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 42% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2600K 145
+41.6%
A8-5600K 102

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 42% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2600K 37
+74.4%
A8-5600K 21

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 74% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-2600K 7754
+18.9%
A8-5600K 6520

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 19% in Geekbench 2.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-2600K 5020
+35.7%
A8-5600K 3700

Core i7-2600K outperforms A8-5600K by 36% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 3.55 1.84
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.18
Recency 9 January 2011 2 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 100 Watt

The Core i7-2600K is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-5600K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2600K and A8-5600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2600K
Core i7-2600K
AMD A8-5600K
A8-5600K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1331 vote

Rate Core i7-2600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 355 votes

Rate A8-5600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2600K or A8-5600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.