i5-13400F vs i7-13800H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-13800H
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
17.01
+7.5%
Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.83

Core i7-13800H outperforms Core i5-13400F by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking384433
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency35.7723.05
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-H (2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$457$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1744FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size96 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligibleno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.5 GHzno data
Execution Units96no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version5.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-13800H 17.01
+7.5%
i5-13400F 15.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-13800H 27020
+7.5%
i5-13400F 25139

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i7-13800H 2765
+17%
i5-13400F 2364

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i7-13800H 287
+13.9%
i5-13400F 252

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i7-13800H 12880
+6.5%
i5-13400F 12095

Blender(-)

i7-13800H 191
i5-13400F 206
+7.9%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i7-13800H 1972
+10%
i5-13400F 1792

7-Zip Single

i7-13800H 6310
+9.9%
i5-13400F 5743

7-Zip

i7-13800H 70500
+17.4%
i5-13400F 60048

WebXPRT 3

i7-13800H 314
+6.8%
i5-13400F 294

CrossMark Overall

i7-13800H 1823
i5-13400F 1941
+6.5%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i7-13800H 283
+11.4%
i5-13400F 254

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i7-13800H 337
+0.3%
i5-13400F 336

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.01 15.83
Physical cores 14 10
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i7-13800H has a 7.5% higher aggregate performance score, 40% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F.

Be aware that Core i7-13800H is a notebook processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13800H and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 28 votes

Rate Core i7-13800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3308 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13800H or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.