EPYC 4345P vs i7-13790F
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-13790F outperforms EPYC 4345P by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 188 | 262 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 60.20 | 60.51 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 42.74 | 34.77 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 10 February 2023 (2 years ago) | 13 May 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $441 | $329 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4345P has 1% better value for money than i7-13790F.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,315 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13790F and EPYC 4345P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.80 | 23.43 |
| Recency | 10 February 2023 | 13 May 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
i7-13790F has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
EPYC 4345P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 4345P in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-13790F is a desktop processor while EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
