Atom x7809C vs i7-13700KF
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-13700KF outperforms Atom x7809C by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 237 | 1342 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 66.98 | 31.98 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.00 | 22.88 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 27 September 2022 (3 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $384 | $117 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-13700KF has 109% better value for money than Atom x7809C.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 8 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1700 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W, 253 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 192 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 89.604 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700KF and Atom x7809C.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.92 | 5.33 |
| Recency | 27 September 2022 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 25 Watt |
i7-13700KF has a 386.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Atom x7809C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 400% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-13700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7809C in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-13700KF is a desktop processor while Atom x7809C is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
