EPYC 9275F vs i7-13700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking204not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency35.70no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359$3,439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 24 48
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

i7-13700F has 392.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-13700F is a desktop processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13700F and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 490 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-13700F or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.